Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Friday, 29 October 2010

Questioning Question Time

I was so irritated by Question Time last week, I actually took the bother of emailing them rather than just grumbling as usual.


"I was deeply offended and disappointed by last night's edition of Question Time, in particular by Mr Dimbleby's quite deliberate marginalisation of issues of importance to Scotland.


It seems to me that by moving Question Time to various locations allows viewers to gain an insight into topical debates in the Nations and regions which make up the United Kingdom. I would find it interesting to hear what is going on in Wales, for example, and feel that for viewers elsewhere, it might be interesting to hear what is being debated in Scotland.

This week Scotland saw a significant change in the law, arguments over priorities in education, the proposed closure of military bases and maintaining of aircraft carrier contracts; meaty issues all. None of these were discussed.

Furthermore, hosting Question Time around the UK gives an opportunity to hear from Scottish politicians from a range of parties (including the Greens, who have been represented in the Scottish Parliament for eleven years now) and from the Scottish Government.

Quite disgracefully, Nicola Sturgeon was consistently interrupted by David Dimbleby, and was not allowed to present the positions of the SNP and the policies of the Scottish Government. The SNP have a serious contribution to make, which was not reflected in the manner in which Nicola Sturgeon was treated by Mr Dimbleby. Comments by other panellists also struck me as having more than a hint of patronising sexism, which went unchallenged by the host.

The issue of Megrahi was dropped into a debate quite purposefully and deliberately by Mr Dimbleby, who then called for comment by the four other panel members but not Ms Sturgeon, whose Government took the quite legally and morally correct position to release a dying man. The last time Question Time was in Scotland, the issue was also raised, seemingly with the purpose of attempting to embarrass the Scottish Government. It was not a 'current' issue in the press, or a matter which required further debate; the decision has been made and is final! I find it quite unacceptable that your programme makes it seem as though this is the one and only issue significant in Scotland.

I find it unacceptable that Scottish issues have no outlet in UK-wide programmes such as Question Time. Scottish issues are never debated when programmes are held outwith Scotland, and when the programme is held in Scotland, apparently we're not allowed to debate Scottish issues then either.

Health, education, crime, and a whole host of other issues irrelevant to devolved parts of the UK are debated week in week out on Question Time without proviso or clarification. It's about time that the rest of the UK got a proper opportunity to glean information about what is important in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and each of the English regions. If hosting in different locations is not to be an opportunity to do this, there's little point in the show moving from London at all.

I hope for better, but thus far and increasingly more often, I am left disappointed.

Kind regards,

Alison Thewliss"


The response just arrived, looking remarkably similar to that issued to Joan McAlpine:


"Dear Ms Thewliss

Thanks for your feedback regarding ‘Question Time’ broadcast on 28 October 2010.



We appreciate some viewers felt chairman David Dimbleby showed anti-Scottish bias by reminding Scotland's Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon about the programme’s wider UK audience.



‘Question Time’ approaches every edition with a broad and wide-ranging remit, covering the major events in the political landscape during the week. We travel across the UK, and local examples are often cited by audience members to highlight a wider point. However this does not mean that the programme seeks to discuss only regionally-specific matters.



On this occasion the panel were expressing their sentiments on the announcement of the most recent GDP figures for the UK. During this discussion Deputy First Minister Sturgeon said “there’s another point on growth, it’s important for a Scottish audience”.



David simply interjected to remind Deputy First Minister Sturgeon that not only was she speaking to the studio audience in Glasgow but also to viewers across the UK.



One of his key roles as chairman is to keep panellists to the specific question under discussion and not to potentially divert to other party political points. He was not stopping her from raising a regional/national point - as has been heard in recent weeks with the al-Megrahi case or the Corus steelworks matter - but simply reminding her of the core programme need for this point to resonate with and be relevant to a UK-wide BBC One audience.



Thanks for taking the time to contact us.

Kind Regards

BBC Audience Services"



I despair.



I spoke to Tory Councillor David Meikle yesterday, and he described the long conversation he had with a member of the Question Time team before getting selected to attend. He's not a nat by any stretch of the imagination, but felt there were plenty of Scottish issues to discuss, all of which were ruled out by the member of BBC staff he spoke to. A letter in today's Herald describes a similar conversation.


This evident anti-Scotland bias is unacceptable, and it has to stop.


Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Indygal makes the news


Anne's blog has been making the news - not least because she's been thrust into the position of becoming Scotland's newest MSP in the saddest of circumstances.

Most reports on her blogging career have come in diary pieces, so I'm a bit concerned by the tone of today's article in the Daily Record.

Labour really are doing their best to smear a story out of nothing, and have been gleefully aided and abetted by the Record in this case. Glasgow's "eastender" has rather ridiculously called for an apology to Parliament. How she thinks that's even appropriate when the comment was made two weeks ago, I can't begin to imagine...

Anne has been blogging for nearly two years now. She's been a candidate, been to Sri Lanka, and updated the world with many aspects of her life. She's more open than most in her blog, and it's this frankness that makes her blog so readable. It's useful for her friends as well as her followers to know what's going on in Anne's life - everyone's so busy these days that blogging and facebook updates are often the only way of keeping up with what goes on in the lives of our friends.

Blogs are both serious and irreverant, they give an insight into people's lives, they give comment on events. I'm guessing this, along with freedom of speech in general, is something Labour just don't understand. By attacking bloggers in the press, they shut down debate and cause the more timid of us to get cagey about what we blog and when we blog. Labour's Kezia Dugdale has recently dipped her toes back in the water after being scared off; others have given up on the catharsis of blogging for a variety of reasons. The blogosphere needs many voices to make it worthwhile; I don't want to see someone so committed to blogging feel that all of a sudden they can't speak their mind.

Anne's "offending" post on the goings on on budget day was actually interesting. On the whole, we don't get to see things this way. Her photoblog (separate to her usual blog) was a fly-on-the-wall, behind the scenes account. It doesn't target any one party unfairly, and all the pictures of non-SNP politicans were taken in the public spaces of the Parliament (mainly the Garden Lobby, where any member of the public can access). The things she picked up on were of public interest, and illustrated how tense the day was. We get media comment, we get diary pieces, we get innuendo in Wholly Rude; it's up to bloggers to fill in the personal interest.

I don't know whether Anne will feel it appropriate to continue blogging as freely as she has done. I think it's understandable if she takes a step back; I would however love to hear where this next adventure takes her, and whether she gets over the loss of her car.

PS - don't know how the Guardian got the photo above, but it's mine. I took it and I'm not credited! For shame.